Naildrivin' ❺

➠ Website of David Bryant Copeland

† Presenters: Delegation vs Just Making a Struct

I posted another blog entry at the Stitch Fix tech blog, this one on using simple structs instead of delegation for adapting your data for web views:

This is another way of saying that we get better, simpler code, without almost the same effort, if we just create a basic class instead of using delegation.

† Startup Engineering Team Super Powers

New post by yours truly on the Stitch Fix Tech Blog about some handy abilities and skills a start-up tech team needs to succeed: Startup Engineering Team Super Powers:

So far, we’ve been able to avoid creating a single monolithic application, and have been consistently delivering and deploying solutions to our users. I believe this is because we’ve developed a set of “super powers” which have been extremely helpful, and I believe these powers will keep our team and technology healthy for years to come.

Org Charts and Diff Production

Square’s @jackdanger wrote a great post on his blog titled ”The Upside Down Org Chart.” It’s a great read on improving how reasonably-sized companies are structured. His use of a tree that expands upwards, showing how management supports subordination, is genius. It visually explains the role of management:

For a tech company to describe their structure this way requires some humility from the leadership. It requires accepting that senior positions must be evaluated based on the support given to individuals on the team rather than the support given to the CEO or executives. But it makes the structure one in which nothing is extracted from the laborers – indeed it provides help that an individual could not find working alone.

His blog post’s description of traditional top-down management structures brought back memories of teams I’ve been on that, despite having favorable org charts, were unpleasant. The problem was that I was treated as (and acted like) a producer of diffs, rather than a problem-solver.

❺➠ Introduction to GLI

Sitepoint recently published Introduction to Thor and, to be honest, I don’t think Thor is a great tool for writing command-line apps. Thor is a great for writing Rails generators (likely the only reasonable tool), but I wrote GLI specifically because I wanted a tool tailor-made to write awesome command-line apps.

With the re-release of my book, which uses GLI to demonstrate how to build amazing command-line apps in Ruby, I thought I’d mimic Sitepoint’s post with a GLI version, and let you decide for yourself.

❺➠ Square Wallet Is Almost Awesome

If you’ve ever been on a vacation where you don’t have perfectly fast network access, and tried to use popular social-networking apps, you can probably identify with my tweet:

I use a lot of applications from companies that present themselves as developer-friendly, agile, forward-thinking, and product-focused. Despite that, these products have very obvious flaws that, to my thinking, reduce the value to both the company and its users (unlike, say, Google Ads, which only reduce value to users).

Tearing apart the three apps I mention above will be an undertaking, so I’d like to start with an app I really, really like, and use almost every day: Square Wallet.

❺➠ Self vs Professional Publishing

I get asked occasionally about the self-publishing process and how it compares to the “professional” publishing process, since I have done both. I thought it might be interesting to compare and contrast these two approaches. The professional approach is regimented, organized, and carries many advantages, while self-publishing allows total freedom, at the cost of doing a lot more work for a lot less money.

† an Introvert Goes to Dinner

I’m trying out Medium as a place to do non-technical writing, mostly to keep this blog’s topic focused on technology. I won’t cross-post everything here, but this is my first one, An Introvert Goes to Dinner. Excerpt:

I actually enjoy solo trips like this. It’s a chance to be as alone as possible: I’m in a city were I don’t know anyone, typically with a lot of free time outside of whatever reason brings me to said city. I know I won’t have to talk to anyone.

Chromebook Keyboard Slightly Innovative

Brief follow up to my A real keyboard for programmers post, I got a Chromebook yesterday and the keyboard, while sporting the same layout as most other computers, actually is better designed for what the Chromebook does.

Namely, it has no function keys, instead using them for browser navigation, window management, and hardware controls. Most amazingly, though, it has no Caps Lock, instead making it a Search key, which makes sense. It’s a big key in a very prominent spot and Search is what Google wants you to do.

A Real Keyboard for Programmers?

Jeff Atwood (AKA codinghorror), introduced a new computer keyboard, produced by WASD, called the CODE keyboard:

I told him that the state of keyboards was unacceptable to me as a geek, and I proposed a partnership wherein I was willing to work with him to do whatever it takes to produce a truly great mechanical keyboard.

Jeff is heralding this as a “truly great mechanical keyboard”. I was very eager to see what such a beast looked like. Here it is:

Oh wait, sorry, that’s the original 101-key version of the IBM PC Keyboard, introduced in 1985. How’d that get there? It’s been almost thirty years, so the CODE keyboard must be awesome, right?